Mark Driscoll gets tithing wrong.
Let’s look at some quotes
The issue is never the dollars, always the devotion.
Of course tithing is about the dollars, otherwise why would we be talking about the tithe at all. I don’t know of any tithe teaches who believe as long as you tried to give a tithe, then that’s all that matters. A tither believes that a minimum of 10% belongs to God and if it’s not given, the devour will be after their finances.
Is Tithing a Sacrifice?
Mark Driscoll related tithing with sacrificial giving numerous times. But how can ‘sacrificial’ and ‘tithing’ be synonymous when everyone’s income and financial level is drastically different from one another? Let me explain. If a rich person gave 10% and if a poor person gave 10%, how much more sacrificial is the poor person’s 10%? Could you consider the rich person to be sacrificial at all?
Our definition of sacrifice is so distorted because most of us are fairly spoiled. Most spoiled people have a strong lust for possessions. So in our eyes, sacrifice might not mean that we gave much. It could mean that we gave very little but had to fight our urges to keep all of it. Let me be clear, the extent at which you had to overcome your lust in order to give is not the also the extent of your sacrifice. We act as if overcoming our sinful nature is adding points to our scoreboard. Most Americans (or other 1st world countries) look at their sacrifices in this way – “God i really wanted that 85-inch flat screen LED 3D TV, but i know that would be selfish so i did not buy it.” Inconvenience does not equate to sacrificial. !0% is sacrificial to some, but not all.
Is Tithing and First Fruits the Same Thing?
10% of your gross not your net. The bible calls it firstfruits. You give first and best to God.
Any half-intelligent person who has studied tithing would know this is just an obvious false statement. There’s no debate about gross vs net tithing. It’s not even questionable. Here are two clear points
- Israel was not required to tithe on their first or the best. Leviticus 27:32-33 says clearly that the tenth (not the first) animal was set aside as the tithe. And that they were not to search whether it was good or bad.
- The first fruit offering was a completely separate gift, offered at a completely separate time, with a completely separate purpose & meaning. The tithe and the first fruit offering were never synonymous in the bible.
I could go into even more evidence disproving the relation to tithing and first fruits, but i would just be beating a horse that is inanimate, breathless, and without all other signs of life. This is not an argument about whether or not God deserves the best. It’s all His, so He deserves the best & worst and first & last.
You don’t have to be a scholar to see that Mark Driscoll (modern church movement leader) is wrong about something so clear and simply written in the bible. Has the guy even read the parts about tithing? I could see how people put on the blinders when it comes to defending tithing, but to also be wrong about first fruit offerings means there’s a habitual problem.
The Tithing Apocalypse
Money tends to place people under some sort of spell. We become zombies and will destroy our closest relatives to satisfy our craving for it. We tend to lose our soul, sanity, and intellect just for the sake of controlling the flow of money. Because of money, thorough preachers will nonchalantly read past scripture when they typically are exhaustive.
Bad doctrine by influential speakers spreads like an apocalyptic disease. The effects consume quickly and efficiently, but to reverse course takes so much effort and time. Hopefully one day Mark Driscoll will get tithing right. Chances of us finding a cure for this tithing zombie apocalypse seem pretty slim at this point.